In contrast, a heuristic is an approach to problem solving that may not be fully specified or may not guarantee correct or optimal results, especially in problem domains where there is no well-defined correct or optimal result. Using human characteristics as descriptors of machines in metaphorical ways was already practiced by Alan Turing with terms such as "memory", "search" and "stimulus". More advanced algorithms can use conditionals to divert the code execution through various routes (referred to as automated decision-making) and deduce valid inferences (referred to as automated reasoning), achieving automation eventually. Algorithms are used as specifications for performing calculations and data processing. In mathematics and computer science, an algorithm ( / ˈ æ l ɡ ə r ɪ ð əm/ ( listen)) is a finite sequence of rigorous instructions, typically used to solve a class of specific problems or to perform a computation. (.Ada Lovelace's diagram from "note G", the first published computer algorithm Dominant firms may be the target of competition policy when they achieve or maintain their dominant position as a result of anti-competitive practices. It is generally assumed that the dominant firm sets its price after ascribing a part of the market to the competitive fringe which then accepts this price as given. The term competitive fringe arises from the basic theory of dominant firm pricing. It is normally assumed that the dominant firm has some competitive advantage (such as lower costs) as compared to the fringe. However, unlike the monopolist, the dominant firm must take into account the competitive fringe firms in making its price/output decisions. Like a monopolist, the dominant firm faces a downward sloping demand curve. Thus the dominant firm may be a monopolist facing potential entrants. The competitive fringe sometimes includes potential entrants. Normally, the dominant firm faces a number of small competitors, referred to as a competitive fringe. However, it is an asymmetric oligopoly because the firms are not of equal size. An industry with a dominant firm is therefore often an oligopoly in that there are a small number of firms. Dominant firms can raise competition concerns when they have the power to set prices independently. Dominant firms are typically considered to have market shares of 40 per cent or more. 30) and Judgment of the Court of First Instance of in case T-102/96, Gencor Ltd v Commission, (1999) E.C.R., page II-0753Ī dominant firm is one which accounts for a significant share of a given market and has a significantly larger market share than its next largest rival. See: Article 102 TFEU and the Merger Regulation, On collective dominance see also: Commission Decision No 97/26/EC of in case IV/M.619 - Gencor/Lonrho (OJ L 11,, p. As the Court has ruled in Gencor, there is no reason in legal or economic terms to exclude from the notion of economic links the relationship of interdependence existing between the parties to a tight oligopoly within which those parties are in a position to anticipate each one another’s behaviour and are therefore strongly encouraged to align their conduct in the market. This situation is called collective (or joint or oligopolistic) dominance. A dominant position may also be enjoyed jointly by two or more independent economic entities being united by economic links in a specific market. The EU merger control system (merger control procedure) differs insofar from this principle, as it prohibits merged entities from obtaining or strengthening a dominant position by way of the merger. Instead, competition rules do not allow companies to abuse their dominant position. Under EU competition law, it is not illegal to hold a dominant position, since a dominant position can be obtained by legitimate means of competition, for example by inventing and selling a better product. A dominant firm holding such market power would have the ability to set prices above the competitive level to sell products of an inferior quality or to reduce its rate of innovation below the level that would exist in a competitive market. © European Court of JusticeĪ firm is in a dominant position if it has the ability to behave independently of its competitors, customers, suppliers and, ultimately, the final consumer. The legal definition of a dominant position in EU law was given by the ECJ in Case 2/76 United Brands Company and United Brands Continentaal BV v Commission of the European Communities : "a position of economic strength enjoyed by an undertaking which enables it to prevent effective competition being maintained on the relevant market by affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of its competitors, its customers and ultimately of its consumers".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |